The Kodak 7.6-inch OLDE WiFi digital photo frame in the picture here had an initial $1,000 price tag. I guess that its ability to play HD video and the touch control make it so expensive. You could always get a netbook for that price or a small laptop. It will get you HD video playback and it will also display pictures for you continuously if you want to do that. Sure it might miss that touch control and the OLED display but still a computer would be much cheaper than Kodak’s frame.

Probably that’s why Kodak has listed it $150 cheaper than the price people expected but the frame is still expensive. Is it just me that noticed it? What do you think?

via Engadget

Related posts:

1. eStarling Impact7 WiFi Digital Photo Frame Costs Less than $100
2. Ipevo Kaleido R7 WiFi Digital Photo Frame
3. Kodak OLED 7.6-Inch frame: Now Available
4. Kodak Debuts World’s First OLED Wireless Frame
5. Jobo 7 Inch Digital Photo Frame